1 / 14

Digital Transformation Ontology Development

Methods, Critiques of Existing Models, and an Emergent ML Implementable Model

Authors

Annette Fog

Dr. Scott J. Warren

University of North Texas

Research Objective

Develop an enhanced Digital Transformation Ontology (DTO) that addresses fundamental limitations in current frameworks by incorporating temporal dynamics, stakeholder differentiation, comprehensive risk management, and contextual sensitivity for machine learning implementation.

Slide 2

Research Contributions & Methodology Overview

Key Contributions

  • Systematic critique of existing ontologies (DT&I-BPM-Onto, COOT, Semantic Models)
  • Six-phase ontology development methodology based on BFO principles
  • Enhanced framework with 9 primary ontological categories
  • Machine-readable specification for AI/ML integration
  • Failure-informed perspective from Sri Lankan case study analysis
Theoretical Innovation
Dynamic vs. static conceptualization
Empirical Foundation
Evidence from transformation failures
Practical Application
Context-sensitive implementation
Technology Integration
AI-ready ontological structure
Methodological Foundation: Grounded in Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) with Aristotelian genus-differentia definitions, ensuring logical consistency and machine readability for ML applications.
Slide 3

Critical Gaps in Current Ontologies

Current Framework Limitations

  • Static conceptualization of transformation
  • Generic stakeholder treatment
  • Limited risk management integration
  • Insufficient contextual adaptation
  • Weak temporal dynamics modeling

Enhancement Requirements

  • Dynamic temporal framework
  • Differentiated stakeholder ecosystems
  • Comprehensive risk taxonomies
  • Context-sensitive contingencies
  • Failure-informed perspectives
Key Finding: The Sri Lankan Bureau of Motor Vehicles case demonstrates how temporal misalignment, stakeholder power dynamics, and governance gaps led to transformation failure despite technical feasibility.
Slide 4

Six-Phase Development Methodology

1

Domain Identification

Scope definition and competency question formulation

2

Ontology Critique

Systematic analysis of existing frameworks

3

Term Extraction

Gathering terminology from studies and failure analyses

4

Hierarchical Structuring

Aristotelian genus-differentia definitions

5

Property Definition

Intrinsic and relational properties with constraints

6

Validation & Refinement

Logical consistency checks and expert review

Methodological Foundation: Based on Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) alignment with Arp, Smith, & Spear (2015) principles for formal ontological realism and machine readability.
Slide 5

Nine Primary Ontological Categories

Organizational Activity
Transformation Component
Process Characteristic
Organizational Network
Management System
Environmental Characteristic
Organizational Capability
Value Process
Management Process

Enhanced Ontological Features

  • Temporal Integration: Lifecycle phases (Exploration → Experimentation → Scaling → Integration → Evolution)
  • Stakeholder Differentiation: Internal, Implementation, Market, Institutional, Community stakeholders
  • Risk Framework: Organizational, Implementation, Cultural, Leadership, Macro-level risks
  • Dynamic Capabilities: Sensing, Seizing, Transforming capabilities
  • Context Sensitivity: Organizational, Environmental, Cultural, Development contexts
Slide 6

Temporal Dynamics Integration

Lifecycle Phases with Distinct Characteristics

Exploration
Opportunity assessment, readiness evaluation
Experimentation
Pilot programs, proof-of-concept testing
Scaling
Broader implementation, change management
Integration
System embedding, institutionalization
Evolution
Continuous adaptation, enhancement

Temporal Rhythms & Pacing Strategies

  • Technology Rhythm: Infrastructure deployment timelines
  • Cultural Rhythm: Gradual behavioral and mindset changes
  • Strategic Rhythm: Decision-making and resource allocation cycles
  • Learning Rhythm: Knowledge acquisition and capability development
Key Insight: Different transformation components operate at different temporal scales, requiring sophisticated coordination to avoid conflicts and maximize synergy.
Slide 7

Stakeholder Ecosystem Differentiation

Five Primary Stakeholder Categories

Internal
Leadership, Employees, Support Functions
Implementation
Agencies, Vendors, Consultants
Market
Customers, Suppliers, Partners
Institutional
Investors, Regulators, Associations
Community
Local communities, Environmental groups

Power Dynamics & Value Networks

  • Authority relationships and influence networks
  • Formal and informal power distribution
  • Inter-organizational coordination challenges
  • Trust deficits and communication barriers
Evidence from Sri Lankan Case: Implementation failure resulted from power imbalances between BMV (beneficiary) and ICTA (implementing agency), demonstrating critical importance of stakeholder authority analysis.
Slide 8

Risk Management Integration

Five Risk Categories with Management Capabilities

Organizational Risks: Cultural resistance, leadership changes, resource constraints
Implementation Risks: Authority deficits, inter-agency conflicts, trust issues
Cultural Risks: Power distance, bureaucratic rigidity, change resistance
Leadership Risks: Vision absence, communication ineffectiveness
Macro-level Risks: Political instability, economic volatility, regulatory changes

Risk Management Capabilities

Sensing
Early identification mechanisms
Assessment
Probability and impact evaluation
Mitigation
Category-specific interventions
Monitoring
Ongoing surveillance systems
Slide 9

Context-Sensitive Contingency Framework

Organizational Context

  • Size and structural characteristics
  • Industry-specific constraints
  • Cultural heritage and change readiness
  • Strategic position and performance

Environmental Context

  • Technological availability and maturity
  • Competitive intensity and dynamics
  • Regulatory frameworks and enforcement
  • Social and cultural expectations

Developing Country Specificities

  • Infrastructure Limitations: Digital infrastructure constraints
  • Skills Gaps: Limited digital literacy and technical capabilities
  • Resource Constraints: Restricted financial investments
  • Institutional Weaknesses: Underdeveloped governance frameworks
  • Cultural Barriers: Traditional practices and technology resistance
Key Principle: Transformation strategies must be tailored to specific organizational and environmental contexts rather than applying universal approaches.
Slide 10

Dynamic Capabilities Architecture

Three Core Dynamic Capabilities

Sensing
Environmental scanning, technology monitoring, market intelligence
Seizing
Decision-making, resource mobilization, partnership development
Transforming
Organizational redesign, process reengineering, capability development
Integration Benefit: The ontology enables systematic modeling of how dynamic capabilities drive organizational adaptation and competitive advantage through structured reasoning about capability development and deployment.
Slide 11

Value Creation & Distribution

Value Creation Mechanisms

  • Efficiency Value: Process improvements, cost reductions, resource optimization
  • Innovation Value: New products, services, business models
  • Network Value: Platform effects, ecosystem participation
  • Option Value: Future opportunities and strategic flexibility

Governance and Coordination Mechanisms

Strategic Governance
Vision setting, resource allocation
Operational Governance
Daily coordination, progress monitoring
Risk Governance
Risk oversight, policy enforcement
Stakeholder Governance
Engagement and relationship management
Value Distribution: The framework recognizes complex stakeholder value sharing through dynamic processes requiring sophisticated coordination and governance mechanisms.
Slide 12

Enhanced Digital Transformation Ontology Model

Digital Transformation Technology Integration Cloud • AI • IoT Temporal Dynamics Phases • Rhythms Stakeholder Ecosystem Risk Framework Governance Structures Strategic • Operational Environmental Context Cultural • Regulatory Dynamic Capabilities Sensing • Seizing Value Creation BFO Aligned Machine Readable
ML Implementation Features: This ontology provides formal semantic relationships, hierarchical classifications, and explicit temporal/contextual modeling that enables AI systems to reason about transformation dependencies and generate context-aware strategies.
Slide 13

Implementation Implications & Future Directions

Practical Applications

  • Diagnostic Tool: Comprehensive readiness assessment across multiple dimensions
  • Strategic Planning: Context-sensitive transformation roadmap development
  • Risk Management: Systematic identification and mitigation strategy design
  • Stakeholder Engagement: Differentiated interaction strategies based on stakeholder types

AI Integration Capabilities

Automated Planning
AI-generated transformation roadmaps
Risk Analysis
ML-based failure prediction
Simulation
Digital twins for scenario testing
Adaptive Strategies
Context-aware recommendations
Future Research: Multi-site validation studies, expert review processes, and inter-rater reliability testing to establish broader empirical foundation and cross-cultural applicability.
Theoretical Contribution: The enhanced ontology provides a machine-readable, BFO-aligned framework that synthesizes process orientation, philosophical rigor, and practical specificity while addressing fundamental limitations in existing approaches.
Slide 14

Questions?

?

Contact Information

Annette Fog
University of North Texas
Dr. Scott J. Warren
University of North Texas
Thank you for your attention!